Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42187906›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Chaotic Itinerancy in Collective Behaviour Emerging from Active Inference: A Multi-Agent Model of Trust and Empowerment Dynamics in Theatre Workshops.

Shoko Miyano, Takashi Shiono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shoko MiyanoCollege of Arts and Sciences, J. F. Oberlin University, Machida 194-0294, Japan.ORCID 0009-0006-2034-4400
Takashi ShionoDepartment of Economics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0951-4695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chaotic itinerancy-irregular switching among metastable collective states-provides a dynamical substrate for flexible social coordination, yet its mechanistic origin in multi-agent systems remains unclear. We present a multi-agent Active Inference model in which chaotic itinerancy emerges from Expected Free Energy minimisation without outcome-level social priors. Agents select actions to minimise Expected Free Energy while updating preferences through a precision-gated learning mechanism modulated by interpersonal trust. Hill-function nonlinearity in state transitions creates bistable "affordance landscapes" that gate behavioural mode switching. Simulations with small number of agents on an Erdős-Rényi trust network reveal spontaneous alternation among multiple metastable behavioural clusters, heavy-tailed dwell-time distributions, and sign-changing finite-time Lyapunov exponents-three hallmarks of chaotic itinerancy. Crucially, replacing Hill-function dynamics with linear transitions reduces the chaotic-itinerancy detection rate from 80% to 20%, demonstrating that nonlinear affordance structure is necessary for generating metastable switching. We further show that agents with simplified internal models of the world sustain richer itinerant dynamics as a group than "perfect-foresight" agents, suggesting that bounded rationality may be functionally advantageous for maintaining behavioural flexibility. These results establish active inference as a principled framework for modelling chaotic itinerancy in social systems and offer a computational account of trust-mediated collective transitions observed in theatre workshops and group dynamics.

Indexed as

active inferencechaotic itinerancyfree energy principlemulti-agent systemstheatre workshopstrust dynamics

Identifiers

PMID42187906
PMCPMC13205385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.