ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Information-Entropic Deep Learning with Gaussian Process Regularisation for Uncertainty-Aware Quantitative Trading.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative trading systems require predictive models that simultaneously deliver accurate forecasts, calibrated uncertainty quantification, and actionable risk measures. This paper proposes an information-theoretic semiparametric regression framework combining a convolutional neural network-Transformer (CNN-Transformer) network for nonlinear temporal dependencies with a Gaussian process (GP) prior for residual autocorrelation and calibrated predictive distributions. Three theoretical results are established: an identifiability theorem guarantees joint recoverability of the nonparametric and GP components; a consistency theorem showing that the penalised maximum likelihood estimator converges at a rate n-1/(2+deff); and a coverage theorem proving asymptotic nominal coverage of the GP's credible intervals. The framework enables an entropy-regulated trading module where predictive differential entropy informs position sizing via an uncertainty-penalised Kelly criterion, Kullback-Leibler divergence quantifies model uncertainty, and CVaR-constrained optimisation controls the tail risk. Simulations show the method outperforms the CNN, long short-term memory (LSTM), Transformer, XGBoost, random forest, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and standard GP regression approaches. Backtesting on four Chinese A-share stocks yielded annualised returns of 15.9-22.4% with Sharpe ratios of 0.49-0.62, maximum drawdowns below 15%, and daily 95% CVaR reductions of 28-31% relative to a full-Kelly baseline, confirming both predictive accuracy and risk management effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.