ArticleBiology2026
DIAG: A Framework for Evaluating Whole-Genome Amplification Quality in Single-Cell SNV Analysis.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell genomics offers novel insights into genomic heterogeneity within cell populations, reframing our understanding of human development, tumorigenesis, and aging. However, constrained by the picogram-scale DNA templates of individual cells, Whole-Genome Amplification (WGA) remains a necessary precondition. Current quality control frameworks primarily focus on amplification uniformity but fail to capture the molecular independence of DNA amplicons, leading to an overestimation of information content in redundant WGA libraries. Here, we propose the Depth of Independent Amplicons Gauge (DIAG) to accurately quantify the effective number of amplicons derived from the primary template. The robustness of the DIAG was first validated using in silico datasets, revealing that the Depth of Independent Amplicons (DIA) is directly coupled with the precision and specificity of mutation calling. Furthermore, we established an organoid-derived ground-truth to evaluate mutation fidelity in real biological contexts, confirming the practical utility of the DIAG. Our results demonstrate that the DIAG provides a high-fidelity assessment of an individual WGA library without the need for costly external experiments, especially in Single-Nucleotide Variant (SNV) calling. Furthermore, we revealed that traditional uniformity indices, like the Gini index or Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, exhibit incongruous fluctuations under down-sampling perturbations. In contrast, the DIA remains a robust and high-fidelity predictor of mutational accuracy, maintaining stability across varying sequencing strategies. Finally, we conducted a systematic comparison of current single-cell Whole-Genome Amplification (scWGA) strategies, providing a standardized benchmarking of diverse technologies for high-resolution single-cell mutation analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.