ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Forward Planning: A Staffing Framework and Ratios for Psychosocial Oncology and Supportive Care Hiring Practices as Cancer Care Models Evolve.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Innovative models of cancer care have emerged in response to advances in cancer treatment, expanding technologies that bring care closer to home and address COVID-19-related challenges and concerns about a shrinking healthcare workforce. Despite the advancements made, the psychosocial impact on people affected by cancer persists. The psychosocial burden of cancer underlines the need for patient access to evidence-based psychosocial oncology (PSO) and supportive care (SC) interventions. As models of care evolve, hiring practices of PSO professionals must also evolve for cancer patients to access properly staffed PSO programs that deliver high-quality and efficient services. In 2019, the Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology (CAPO)-Clinical Advisory Committee consulted administrators and clinicians across Canada to understand caseload volumes of PSO professionals with a goal to set staffing ratios. The engagement process revealed that there is no consistency in staffing PSO programs across Canada, let alone staffing ratios for PSO disciplines. In 2022, CAPO introduced a 10-point staffing framework and formula to calculate staffing ratios for hiring PSO professionals, beginning with the social work discipline. The goal of this paper is to provide updates to the existing framework and demonstrate how the formula can be adapted to other PSO disciplines. To our knowledge, this is the first published paper in Canada outlining the calculations for a PSO staff framework and formula. The authors advocate for greater transparency when reporting PSO staffing ratios across Canada, using this framework as a reference point. Organizations reporting on the cancer system performance are encouraged to develop PSO indicators, starting with tracking patient access to PSO services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.