ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Supporting Advance Care Planning Among Mandarin and Cantonese Speaking Communities: A Qualitative Exploratory Study.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advance Care Planning Among People from Ethnic Minority and Non-Ethnic Minority Backgrounds with Poor-Prognosis Cancers: A Single-Site Retrospective Medical Record Review Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advance Care Planning in Multicultural Communities: A Document Analysis of Resources to Support Healthcare Staff and Consumers in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whilst advance care planning (ACP) is important to ensure person-centred end of life care, there is sparse evidence about factors contributing towards engagement for people from Mandarin and Cantonese speaking backgrounds (MCSB) affected by cancer. This study aimed to establish barriers and facilitators for quality ACP among people from MCSB with cancer and carers. A qualitative study utilising semi-structured interviews and focus groups was conducted. Participants included adult community members from MCSB in New South Wales who had accessed cancer care services in Australia as a support person or a patient in the last five years with recruitment done purposefully. Data collected from eligible consenting participants were audio/video recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Method applying the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eighteen people participated (11 in two focus groups, seven individual interviews). Key barriers to engagement with ACP were unclear understanding of process and conduct, poor quality communication by healthcare staff, resource constraints and cultural misalignment of ACP concepts. The main facilitators were openness of participants to discussions, culturally informed community resources and dedicated ACP services. Co-design provides a useful approach to address varied identified factors. At the system and service level, co-design with these communities and healthcare providers could potentially develop resources to assist these communities in engaging with ACP, including preparing for ACP communication. Understanding and acknowledging cultural factors that impact ACP and integrating this knowledge in ACP communication may enhance engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.