ArticleYeast (Chichester, England)2026
rDNAmine: A New Tool for the Analysis of Long Repetitive Sequences.
Article in Yeast (Chichester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we introduce a novel approach for analysing long, repetitive genomic sequences. Our methods significantly advance research on rDNA polymorphism. First, we describe a technique for isolating high-molecular-weight DNA from individual chromosomes, enabling selective enrichment of sequencing libraries for extensive genomic regions of interest. Second, we present rDNAmine, a bioinformatic toolkit for capturing and examining large repetitive arrays in Oxford Nanopore sequencing data. This approach facilitates the study of polymorphisms within long repeats, bypassing traditional alignment-based methods and providing a more efficient and scalable solution for investigating repetitive regions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through the analysis of rDNA arrays in two yeast species, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. In S. cerevisiae, rDNA arrays show limited polymorphism, while in C. albicans, we observe substantial variation in rDNA module size, with two distinct repeat populations within the array. These findings reveal species-specific differences in the structural organisation of rDNA loci, highlighting the diverse nature of tandem repeat architecture. The rDNAmine toolkit is broadly applicable to various organisms and repetitive genomic contexts, offering a versatile platform for studying repetitive sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.