ArticleBiosensors2026
XAI-Supported Electronic Tongue for Estimating Milk Composition and Adulteration Indicators.
Article in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, a low-cost AS7265x-based multispectral electronic tongue system was developed for estimating milk composition and adulteration indicators and supported with an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework. Experimental analyses were conducted on 190 augmented commercial milk samples, where fat, protein, solids-not-fat (SNF), density, freezing point, and added water ratio were treated as target variables. Sensor data were modeled as RAW, DERIVED, and FUSION feature sets, and regression performance was compared using Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, KNN, and XGBoost. Model validation was carried out with both five-fold cross-validation and Leave-One-Out (LOO) strategies to assess field-level generalizability. Results showed that a narrow-band, low-cost optical sensor platform can estimate not only fat and protein but also SNF, density, and freezing point with high accuracy. Within the XAI framework, permutation-based importance analysis and SHAP were used to identify critical spectral bands for each target parameter, enabling data-driven recommendations for band-oriented sensor design optimization. The study presents a scalable methodology that integrates low-cost sensor design, multi-parameter quality estimation, and explainable modeling beyond traditional fat-protein-focused approaches. Across all six targets, the XAI analysis consistently identified the near-infrared channel at 860 nm (asIR_3) as the most informative band, reflecting the combined effect of water absorption and Mie scattering by fat globules; the visible channel at 680 nm (asVIS_4) emerged as a secondary band, reflecting dissolved-matter scattering. These bands are therefore the natural starting point for cost-reduced versions of the sensor. Among the compared feature sets (RAW, DERIVED, FUSION), the 18-band RAW configuration provided the most balanced performance across all six targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.