ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Model Predictive Control with a PSO Modelling Approach for Position Control of a Compliant Ankle Rehabilitation Robot.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Compliant Ankle Rehabilitation Robot (CARR) is actuated by four Pneumatic Artificial Muscles (PAMs). These actuators mimic biological muscles, making them highly applicable in robotic systems designed to apply guiding motion to a human joint, but have complex nonlinear dynamic properties making accurate tracking control difficult. This paper presents intelligent modelling and control methods to improve the CARR's function in a rehabilitation setting. Using the Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) algorithm, dynamic models of the actuators are calculated. Two model setups are proposed, a single model and dual model. Model Predictive Control (MPC) was then implemented using these models and experimentally compared with Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) and Iterative Learning Control (ILC). The results showed that PID control was less accurate than the developed control schemes, with evidence of significant chattering, as well as both over- and undershooting the setpoint. ILC performed accurately, but the required learning period and some evidence of overfitting impacted the overall performance. Single-model MPC had low error values on the X axis of the CARR and maintained the most consistent 0 displacement when an axis was intended to stay motionless. Dual-model MPC had the lowest error values on the Y axis, the smoothest motion with the least chattering, and the best performance when both axes were in motion, but showed evidence of overshooting. Based on these results, both MPC implementations have proven to be successful and suitable for future work, and the PSO modelling method is able to produce suitably accurate models for the application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.