ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Robust Detection of Small Moving Objects Against Real-World Complex Dynamic Natural Environments: Drosophila-Inspired Visual Neural Pathway Modeling.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bio-Inspired Low-Light Image Enhancement with Large Kernel Convolution and Attention.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, small moving object detection remains a highly challenging problem, primarily attributable to four critical factors: limited pixel coverage, blurred texture features, indistinguishability from small-object-like background features (i.e., false positives), and vulnerability to environmental noise interference. The remarkable sensitivity of the Drosophila visual system to small moving objects, which originates from a specialized type of neuron known as "lobula columnar 11" (LC11), has provided inspiration for addressing this challenge. Current bio-inspired visual models have achieved certain advances. However, detection performance against real-world complex dynamic natural environments still requires further improvement. To address the challenge of limited detection accuracy for small moving objects against real-world complex dynamic natural environments, this paper proposes a Motion Small Object Detection (MSOD) model inspired by the Drosophila Vision Small Object Motion Sensitivity (DVSOMS) mechanism, namely DVSOMS-MSOD. The model consists of four stages: The first stage is preliminary processing of visual stimuli, where visual stimuli are perceived, converted to grayscale, and blurred. The second stage is the motion neural pathway, where visual signals are first decomposed into parallel ON and OFF neural pathway signals; then, the neural feedback mechanism is incorporated between the medulla and lobula complex, and the complete Hassenstein-Reichardt correlator (HRC) is integrated into the lobula complex; finally, the LC11 neuron is utilized to detect small moving objects and extract their location information. The third stage is the contrast neural pathway, where visual signals are first processed by the central and surrounding local neighborhoods, then local contrast information is calculated. The fourth stage is the integration of motion and contrast neural pathways, where the mushroom body generates motion trajectories using the location information of small moving objects, and subsequently generates contrast trajectories using the local contrast information and motion trajectories to more finely detect small moving objects. Under real-world complex dynamic natural environment datasets, compared with conventional machine learning methods for moving object detection, the proposed model achieved improvements of 77.82% and 78.70% in detection performance and output quality, respectively, while reducing running time by 10.60%. Compared with bio-inspired visual models for small moving object detection, the proposed model achieved improvements of 28.24% and 43.15% in detection accuracy and detection performance, respectively, but the running time increased by 43.40%. The proposed model demonstrates certain advantages in detection performance, output quality, and detection accuracy; however, its real-time performance still warrants further optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.