ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
V-CHIMERA: An Immune-Inspired Verified Framework for Organizational Cyber Crisis Response Under Misinformation.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In organizational cyber crises, incident response and official communication form coupled control loops, yet they are usually engineered separately. We present V-CHIMERA (Verified Coupled Human-Information-Machine Incident Response Architecture), a framework for organizational cyber crisis response under misinformation that jointly models cyber state, belief dynamics, trust, and communication governance. The framework combines three elements: an explicit cyber-social coupling architecture, a runtime protocol shield for communication safety, and immune-gated coupling (IGC) that uses danger signaling, tolerance thresholds, and immune memory to regulate when social feedback should affect operational response and how strongly counter-messaging should be targeted. Across three representative scenarios-ransomware rumor, outage rumor, and exfiltration scam-and eight seeds per scenario, all shielded policies achieved zero executed protocol violations. Relative to naive coupled control, IGC reduced cyber-harm area under the curve (AUC) by 57.6% in ransomware rumor and 42.6% in outage rumor while also reducing misbelief. Results were scenario-dependent rather than uniformly dominant: in exfiltration scam, a broadcast-only ablation outperformed targeted messaging, showing that targeting can fail when diffusion rapidly crosses community boundaries. Sensitivity analysis further shows that IGC attenuates the brittleness observed under strong coupling and weak moderation. The results suggest that biomimetic regulation is valuable not because coupling always helps, but because it prevents overreaction, clarifies when targeting should be used, and yields safer organizational defaults for misinformation-aware incident response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.