ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Review of Progress of AI in Biomimetics: From Biological Patterns to Closed-Loop Discovery.
Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applications of Nanofabrication Technologies in the Preparation of Biomimetic Structures.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomimetic materials mimic biological structures and functions. They are crucial for addressing complex challenges in tissue engineering, sustainable architecture, and energy storage. Traditionally, designing these materials requires slow, resource-intensive trial-and-error methods and physics-based simulations. Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have transformed this field. They translate biological intelligence into actionable engineering logic and rapidly explore massive design spaces. Despite rapid advancements, the field still faces several critical bottlenecks, including complexity mismatches, data scarcity, and limited interpretability. This review examines AI-driven biomimetic design across five primary "interfaces": (1) Biological Pattern Recognition, (2) Structural Optimization, (3) Generative Morphogenesis, (4) Adaptive Fabrication, and (5) Data-Driven Discovery Platforms. The review also outlines future perspectives, especially the shift toward autonomous "closed-loop" laboratories. In these labs, AI will manage the entire workflow, i.e., design, synthesis, and testing, without human intervention. Future efforts will likely focus on multi-model data mining to understand complex, life-like properties. Furthermore, research aims to develop Explainable AI (XAI) to ensure deterministic modeling in safety-critical applications. The ultimate goal is a synergistic relationship. AI will design materials, but these materials, using biomimetic metabolic or neural models, will also help construct more efficient AI architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.