Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42187387›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Review of Progress of AI in Biomimetics: From Biological Patterns to Closed-Loop Discovery.

Zhong Hu, Haiping Hong, Tim Lin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhong HuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, J. J. Lohr College of Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brooking, SD 57007, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8014-8464
Haiping HongDepartment of Industrial & Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2190-3332
Tim LinAgeis Tech Inc., Santa Ana, CA 92706, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomimetic materials mimic biological structures and functions. They are crucial for addressing complex challenges in tissue engineering, sustainable architecture, and energy storage. Traditionally, designing these materials requires slow, resource-intensive trial-and-error methods and physics-based simulations. Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have transformed this field. They translate biological intelligence into actionable engineering logic and rapidly explore massive design spaces. Despite rapid advancements, the field still faces several critical bottlenecks, including complexity mismatches, data scarcity, and limited interpretability. This review examines AI-driven biomimetic design across five primary "interfaces": (1) Biological Pattern Recognition, (2) Structural Optimization, (3) Generative Morphogenesis, (4) Adaptive Fabrication, and (5) Data-Driven Discovery Platforms. The review also outlines future perspectives, especially the shift toward autonomous "closed-loop" laboratories. In these labs, AI will manage the entire workflow, i.e., design, synthesis, and testing, without human intervention. Future efforts will likely focus on multi-model data mining to understand complex, life-like properties. Furthermore, research aims to develop Explainable AI (XAI) to ensure deterministic modeling in safety-critical applications. The ultimate goal is a synergistic relationship. AI will design materials, but these materials, using biomimetic metabolic or neural models, will also help construct more efficient AI architectures.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomimetic materialsdeep learningdeep reinforcement learningmachine learningmaterial design and development

Identifiers

PMID42187387
PMCPMC13204145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.