ArticlePublic health nutrition2026
Response to: Need for longitudinal evidence on child and adolescent nutrition in the Amazon.
Article in Public health nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We welcome the Letter to the Editor and their thoughtful commentary on our recently published study examining temporal trends in overweight and obesity among schoolchildren in Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil, from 2006 to 2024. We fully concur with their central argument: the evidence base on child and adolescent nutrition in the Amazon region remains heavily reliant on cross-sectional and repeated cross-sectional designs, with longitudinal cohort studies representing a critical and largely unmet need. Our own findings underscore the urgency of building the longitudinal infrastructure necessary to identify causal determinants of these trends. The Amazon basin, home to approximately 40 million people across nine countries and over 300 indigenous ethnic groups, presents a uniquely complex socio-ecological context marked by rapid urbanization, nutrition transition, environmental exposures, and profound structural inequities that cross-sectional evidence alone cannot adequately characterize. We endorse the authors' call for the prioritization of long-term longitudinal studies and, in particular, their vision of multi-center, transnational Amazonian cohorts supported by multi-country funding. We further propose that our established school-based surveillance infrastructure in Western Amazonia could serve as a meaningful foundation for future binational or multi-site collaborative research. We invite the authors to explore this possibility and look forward to contributing to a broader, coordinated research agenda aimed at improving child and adolescent health across the Amazon basin.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.