ArticleJournal of vision2026
Attentional modulation of size perception in peripheral vision.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The perceived size of objects decreases with increasing eccentricity, a phenomenon known as the "size-eccentricity effect." This bias is thought to reflect cortical magnification: the overrepresentation of central vision relative to peripheral vision. Previous studies suggest that attention may influence this perceptual distortion, yet the specific contribution of endogenous attention remains debated. Here, we investigated whether endogenous attention attenuates or exacerbates the size-eccentricity effect. Ten healthy right-handed participants performed a size comparison task. On each trial, participants judged the size of a peripheral rectangle (presented at 8.9°, 15.6°, or 23.4° eccentricity) compared to a fixed central reference. Endogenous attention was manipulated using central arrow cues that predicted the location of the peripheral stimulus with 70% validity. Perceived size was quantified using psychometric functions to extract the point of subjective equivalence based on response accuracy or reaction time. As predicted by the size-eccentricity effect, participants systematically underestimated the size of peripheral relative to central objects. Importantly, this underestimation was significantly reduced in the valid cueing condition, particularly at greater eccentricities, indicating that endogenous attention attenuates the size-eccentricity effect. Attention also enhanced sensitivity, as shown by steeper psychometric slopes. These findings suggest that endogenous attention actively compensates for cortical magnification by "rescaling" peripheral representations, leading to better perceptual size accuracy and discriminability. In contrast, misallocation of attention increases peripheral underestimation, paralleling pathological biases in optic ataxia. We propose that dorsal parietal regions implement this attentional rescaling, supporting accurate perception and visuomotor transformations in peripheral vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.