Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42187122›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Cognitive simplicity drives collective route improvements in homing pigeons.

Shoubhik Chandan Banerjee, Fritz A Francisco, Albert B Kao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shoubhik Chandan BanerjeeDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4533-2140
Fritz A FranciscoDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8258-2221
Albert B KaoDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8232-8365

Funding

U.S. National Science Foundation BRC-BIO DBI-2233416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive abilities are central to how animals navigate complex environments. Beyond individual cognition, group living can also enhance navigation by pooling individually acquired information. One way this may be achieved is by following experienced leaders, which requires recognizing expertise within group members. Alternatively, accurate decisions could also emerge without expert opinions, through simpler mechanisms like the 'wisdom of crowds' principle that average out individual biases. Consequently, collective navigation strategies range from cognitively complex to simple, and yet, the prevalence or interplay of different collective strategies in nature remains unexplored. In this study, we asked: what is the navigation mechanism, requiring minimal cognitive demands, that is necessary and sufficient to quantitatively replicate the experimental results of a 2017 study on homing pigeons (

Indexed as

CognitionColumbidaeHoming BehaviorSpatial NavigationAnimalsFlight, AnimalSocial Behaviorcollective intelligenceColumba liviacumulative cultural evolutionecologynavigationphysics of living systemswisdom of crowds

Identifiers

PMID42187122
PMCPMC13211876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.