ArticleHistopathology2026
Expression of melanocytic markers in uterine smooth muscle tumours.
Article in Histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsUterine smooth muscle tumours (SMTs) conventionally express myogenic markers such as desmin, h-caldesmon and smooth muscle actin by immunohistochemistry. In contrast, the frequency and extent of melanocytic marker (MM) expression, commonly assessed in the differential diagnosis with perivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas), remain poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the positivity of MMs and Cathepsin K in a large cohort of SMTs. METHODS AND
resultsIn total, 102 tumours were retrospectively identified, including 72 leiomyomas of various subtypes, 4 cases of SMT of uncertain malignant potential and 26 leiomyosarcomas. Immunohistochemistry for HMB-45, Melan-A, PRAME and Cathepsin K was performed on whole-tissue sections and assessed for the presence, extent and intensity of staining. A chi-square test was used to determine statistical significance. Thirty-eight tumours (37.2%) expressed at least one MM (excluding Cathepsin K). PRAME was the most frequently expressed marker (30/102, 29.4%), showing strong nuclear staining in 27 tumours (26%), predominantly in a focal distribution (<50% of cells; 27/30, 90%). HMB-45 was positive in 16/102 tumours (15.6%), with focal expression in all cases (16/16, 100%), and Melan-A was focally positive only in 2/102 tumours (1.9%). Cathepsin K expression was seen in 32/102 tumours (31.4%), being focal in most positive cases (28/32, 87.5%). Co-expression of PRAME and HMB-45 was observed in 10 cases (9.8%), while no SMT demonstrated co-expression of HMB-45 and Melan-A. In 4 of the 7 HMB-45-positive conventional leiomyomas, staining was observed only in the hyalinized areas. There was no significant difference in the frequency of MM staining between benign/uncertain behaviour (leiomyomas/SMTs of uncertain malignant potential) (36.8%) and malignant tumours (leiomyosarcomas) (38.5%; P = 0.88).
conclusionWe observed that a subset of SMTs may express MMs, typically in a focal and weak pattern. In our series, no SMT showed concurrent positivity for both HMB-45 and Melan-A; therefore, when evaluating a tumour with equivocal morphology that demonstrates dual and/or diffuse expression of these markers, the diagnosis should be carefully reconsidered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.