ReviewEndocrine connections2026
Fertility preservation in prepubertal boys: management and follow-up challenges.
Review in Endocrine connections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Survival after childhood cancer and severe haematological disorders has improved substantially, shifting clinical attention towards long-term quality-of-life outcomes. Preservation of male reproductive potential represents a major challenge, particularly in boys exposed to gonadotoxic therapies before the onset of spermatogenesis. While sperm cryopreservation is an established fertility preservation strategy for postpubertal males, no clinically validated option currently exists for prepubertal boys. Male fertility depends on the establishment and lifelong maintenance of a finite spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) pool within a specialized somatic microenvironment. Although the prepubertal testis lacks active spermatogenesis, it already contains the SSC populations required for future fertility and these are vulnerable to cytotoxic injury. Clinical and histological evidence shows that chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including conditioning regimens for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, can deplete SSCs even when exposure occurs in early childhood, with consequences that may become apparent only at puberty or later in adulthood. Testicular tissue cryopreservation (TTC) has emerged as the only potential fertility preservation strategy for prepubertal boys at high risk of treatment-induced infertility. TTC aims to preserve immature testicular tissue containing SSCs for possible future use through experimental approaches. However, no human pregnancies have yet been achieved using tissue cryopreserved before puberty, and all current applications remain experimental. This review summarizes current practice for TTC in prepubertal boys, with a particular focus on the issues most relevant to paediatric endocrinologists involved in the long-term follow-up and management of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.