ArticleScience progress
Safety and feasibility of transitioning from conventional burr-hole craniostomy to endoscope-assisted evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveAlthough endoscope-assisted evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) may reduce recurrence rates, its adoption has been limited by a procedural learning curve that may affect operative efficiency and clinical outcomes. This study compared conventional burr-hole craniostomy with endoscope-assisted evacuation for symptomatic cSDH and evaluated the challenges of institutional implementation.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with symptomatic cSDH treated between 2023 and 2025. Patients in the treatment group underwent endoscopic-assisted hematoma evacuation, while those in the control group received conventional burr-hole craniostomy. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact or Chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of outcomes, with results reported as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed p < 0.05. All analyses were conducted using R software.ResultsA total of 110 patients were included (treatment group,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.