ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2026
Is SORL1 a common genetic target across neurodegenerative diseases? A multi-ancestry biobank study.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update ofIs2026
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SORL1, the gene encoding the SORLA protein, has arisen as a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Studies suggest that restoring SORLA function or its trafficking pathways, particularly the SORLA-retromer recycling system, may offer a promising strategy to slow or halt AD progression. While both rare and common SORL1 variants have been associated with increased AD risk, recent evidence suggests a potential involvement of SORL1 in other neurodegenerative conditions. This study assessed the contribution of SORL1 genetic variation to the risk of AD, related dementias (RD), and Parkinson's disease (PD) using data from six large-scale biobanks, comprising 15,043 AD, 9,943 RD, and 42,763 PD cases, along with 111,969 controls across 11 ancestries. We identified 53 potentially disease-related SORL1 variants (CADD score > 20, MAC ≥ 2, annotated as protein-altering or splicing, and with the mutated allele present only in cases), including 41 novel and 12 previously reported variants. Three were found across multiple ancestries. Overall, 13 variants were found in AD-related cohorts, 5 in RD cohorts, and 35 in PD cohorts. Association analysis identified 10 nominally significant variants associated with AD and 5 with PD. The replication of multiple SORL1 variants across neurodegenerative diseases and ancestrally diverse populations underscores its potential broad genetic contribution to neurodegeneration and reinforces its relevance across distinct clinical phenotypes. Burden analysis identified a nominal association of SORL1 variants in PD in the South Asian population (P = 0.048). A family-based analysis identified a rare predicted-damaging variant in two East Asian families (11:121478242:G:A, p.R176Q) and two variants in two families of European ancestry (11:121514222:A:C, p.N371T; 11:121545392:G:A, p.V672M) that show some evidence of segregation in PD families. Although these variants were slightly more frequent in unrelated PD cases vs. controls, none of them showed statistically significant enrichment in PD, likely due to their very low frequency. Overall, our results extend the understanding of SORL1 beyond AD, suggesting a broader role in neurodegeneration and emphasizing the need for diverse population studies when evaluating genetic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42186854What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.