Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186846›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

How the desert ant Cataglyphis fortis uses its nest hill for homing.

Lin Jiang, Markus Knaden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lin JiangDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Markus KnadenDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6710-1071

Funding

Max-Planck-GesellschaftMax-Planck-Institut für chemische Ökologie
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The desert ant Cataglyphis fortis relies on path integration and environmental cues for navigation. In featureless environments, nest hills serve as landmarks that enhance homing success. We found that homing ants can discriminate their own nest hills from others based on visual cues. When, as a result of experimental displacement, the path integrator points towards a foreign nest, the ants compare visual cues from the perceived nest hill with their memory and continue approaching only if the hill size does not deviate markedly from the memorised one. Homing ants that mistake a foreign hill for their own climb it, indicating that the hills do not provide nest-specific contact cues. However, near the nest entrance in the centre of the volcano-shaped hills, nest-specific cues circumvent the risk of ants entering the wrong nest, where they would be killed. These findings demonstrate the integration of different modalities that enable ants to optimise their homing.

Indexed as

AntsHoming BehaviorAnimalsCuesSpatial NavigationVisual PerceptionCue integrationLandmark navigationMultimodal navigationVisual cues

Identifiers

PMID42186846
PMCPMC13286360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.