Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186819›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Doubly Robust Estimators of the Restricted Mean Time in Favor Estimands in Individual- and Cluster-Randomized Trials.

Xi Fang, Bingkai Wang, Guangyu Tong, Liangyuan Hu, Shuangge Ma, Fan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xi FangDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6692-5730
Bingkai WangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Guangyu TongDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7697-5029
Liangyuan HuDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9001-4999
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6183-1893

Funding

Randomized Trial of a Multifactorial Fall Injury Prevention Strategy-SupplementU01AG048270 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BHASIN, SHALENDER, GILL, THOMAS MICHAEL · 2014 to 2019
$34.8M
New win methods for addressing multiple and composite outcomes in cluster-randomized trialsR01HL178513 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Fan Li · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01HL178513-01NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL178513NIA NIH HHS U01 AG048270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progressive multi-state survival outcomes are common in trials with recurrent or sequential events and require treatment effect estimands that remain interpretable without proportional intensity or Markov assumptions. The restricted mean time in favor of treatment (RMT-IF) extends the restricted mean survival time to ordered multi-state processes and provides such an interpretable estimand. However, existing RMT-IF methods are nonparametric, assume covariate-independent censoring for independent observations, and do not accommodate cluster-randomized trials (CRTs), limiting both efficiency and applicability. We develop a class of doubly robust estimators for RMT-IF under right censoring using an augmented inverse-probability weighting framework that combines stage-specific outcome regression with arm-specific censoring models, yielding consistency when either nuisance model is correctly specified. We further extend the framework to CRTs by formalizing both cluster-level and individual-level average RMT-IF estimands to address informative cluster size and by constructing corresponding doubly robust estimators that account for within-cluster correlation. For inference, we employ model-agnostic jackknife variance estimators in both individually randomized and cluster-randomized settings. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate finite-sample performance, and the methods are illustrated using two randomized trial examples.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansSurvival AnalysisTime Factorscovariate adjustmentcovariate‐dependent censoringdoubly‐robust estimationestimandsmulti‐state survival outcomerestricted mean time in favor

Identifiers

PMID42186819
PMCPMC13395246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.