Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186732›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Healthcare professionals' perceptions of the acceptability of the PREVENT-PE trial: A mixed-methods survey and interview study.

Angel Leung, James Goadsby, Kayleigh S Sheen, Sergio A Silverio, Laura A Magee, Peter von Dadelszen, Argyro Syngelaki, Kypros H Nicolaides

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Angel LeungHarris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3391-5380
James GoadsbyHarris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5381-1670
Kayleigh S SheenDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1254-1763
Sergio A SilverioDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-3471
Laura A MageeDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1355-610X
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4136-3070
Argyro SyngelakiHarris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5856-6072
Kypros H NicolaidesHarris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1266-0711

Funding

Fetal Medicine FoundationThermo Fisher Scientific
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a lack of published data on how healthcare professionals perceive the acceptability of third-trimester risk screening in pregnancy. The PREVENT-PE trial [ISRCTN41632964] demonstrated that a personalized approach to term pre-eclampsia risk assessment to inform risk-stratified timed birth at term reduced the incidence of term PE by 30%, without increasing Cesarean birth or neonatal morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the acceptability of the PREVENT-PE trial among healthcare professionals. MATERIAL AND

methodsStaff were invited to an online survey comprising validated metrics of acceptability, which were analyzed descriptively. Also, the staff were invited to one-to-one interviews to probe the acceptability of the trial in more depth. Using template analysis, responses were mapped onto the following domains of acceptability: Sense-making (Intervention Coherence), Commitment (Affective Attitude), Change (Burden), Communication (Ethicality), Motivation (Opportunity Costs), Action (Self-Efficacy), and Evaluation (Perceived Effectiveness).

resultsThere were 65 completed surveys, whilst 19 healthcare professionals participated in interviews. Forty-one staff participants were from King's College Hospital, and twenty-one staff participants were from Medway Maritime Hospital, in line with the recruitment of participants to the trial. Approximately 29% of staff were of non-White ethnicity. Most staff were doctors or midwives, in similar proportions. One-third of staff participants had no prior involvement in clinical trials. Acceptability was endorsed by the majority of survey respondents (69.2%), as "very acceptable" (44.6%) or "somewhat acceptable" (24.6%). Interview findings endorsed acceptability from most staff toward participating in an evidence-based trial such as PREVENT-PE. Despite some concerns about implementation burden, system-level readiness, and counseling high-risk participants, the staff supported integrating such screening into routine maternity care if effectiveness is confirmed.

conclusionsThe PREVENT-PE trial had a high level of acceptability among healthcare professionals. Staff view risk screening in the third trimester of pregnancy as acceptable, with potential to positively impact patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPre-EclampsiaAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdRisk AssessmentSurveys and Questionnaireshealthcare professionalspre‐eclampsia acceptabilitystaff surveystrial evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42186732
PMCPMC13356467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.