ArticleChemical research in toxicology2026
A Benchmark Evaluation of Chemical Structure Extraction from Patents: Insights and Challenges in Chemical Structure Recognition.
Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early warning systems (EWSs) are currently being developed by various authorities aiming at identifying potentially hazardous chemicals before they become a threat to the environment and human health. In this context, patents provide an excellent data source for exploring novel chemistry or the use of chemicals in materials and products. However, analysis of patents is challenging, including unraveling molecular structures presented as graphics depicting various elements, functional groups, and molecular bonds. Our study aims to improve EWS using automated artificial intelligence-based molecular structure recognition methods for encoding these for further hazard analysis. Current structure extraction tools are primarily trained on chemical structures collected from publicly available data sets, and the application of these tools to patent-specific chemical data has received little attention. This paper presents a field study utilizing the three tools Decimer, Molscribe, and Mathpix and assesses their performance in recognizing chemical structures in patents. Two data sets were compiled and curated including (1) diverse organic chemicals and (2) per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). It was revealed that these tools perform well on simpler molecular structures, whereas they struggle with more complex structural features, including repetitive units, cross-bonding, and Markush structures. Furthermore, it was discovered that these tools are extremely sensitive to image artifacts such as noise from lines and dots or distortions. Overcoming these challenges will be critical before implementation in automated EWS and thereby enable screening of patents for rapid and effective identification of potentially hazardous emerging chemicals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.