Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186598›Full record

ArticleCurrent health sciences journal

Cognitive Fusion-Guided Transperineal Biopsy Leading to the Diagnosis of Early Prostate Adenocarcinoma After Repeated Negative Evaluations: A Case Report.

Mihai-Alexandru Radu, Andrei Pănuș, Andrei Drocaș, Dragoș Florin Vasile, Nicoleta Alice Drăgoescu, George Mitroi, Cecil Sorin Mirea, Petru Octavian Drăgoescu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mihai-Alexandru RaduDepartment of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Andrei PănușDepartment of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Andrei DrocașDepartment of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Dragoș Florin VasileDepartment of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Nicoleta Alice DrăgoescuDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
George MitroiDepartment of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Cecil Sorin MireaDepartment of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
Petru Octavian DrăgoescuDepartment of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer remains one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in men, where early detection is key to curative treatment. Conventional biopsy techniques can miss small or focal lesions, especially in cases with persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and uncertain imaging, risking delayed diagnosis. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 69-year-old male who initially presented in 2022 with lower urinary tract symptoms and an elevated PSA level of 26.17ng/ml. He was diagnosed with acute prostatitis and responded favourably to targeted treatment. Over the following two years, his PSA levels remained in the "gray zone" (7.24-8.68ng/ml), raising continued clinical suspicion despite normal findings on digital rectal examination (DRE), PIRADS 3 lesions on serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and two previous transperineal prostate biopsies, including a saturation biopsy-both with benign histopathology. In July 2025, the patient presented for the first time to our center. A new mpMRI again showed a PIRADS 3 lesion in the transitional zone of the right prostatic lobe. Given the persistent suspicion and previous negative results, a transperineal cognitive fusion-guided biopsy was performed, combining MRI-targeted and systematic sampling. Histopathological evaluation identified a 0.55 mm focus of acinar adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 7 (3+4).

conclusionThis case illustrates how cognitive fusion-guided biopsy can detect clinically significant prostate cancer in patients who have undergone prior negative standard biopsies. The technique improves diagnostic detection rates and represents a valuable, accessible alternative for centers without computer-assisted fusion platforms.

Indexed as

cognitive fusion biopsyGleason scoremultiparametric MRIProstate cancerPSAtransperineal

Identifiers

PMID42186598
PMCPMC13198755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.