ArticleCurrent health sciences journal
The Rectal Wings-Highlighting by Dissection, Contents and Clarifications Regarding the Terminology.
Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rectum is stabilized within the pelvis by connective condensations traditionally termed rectal wings or ligaments, classically divided into lateral and posterior components. Their anatomical definition, composition, and relationship with the mesorectum and pelvic fasciae remain controversial, despite their surgical significance during total mesorectal excision (TME). This study aims to clarify the structure, contents, and topographical relationships of the rectal wings through cadaveric dissection. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive anatomical dissection was conducted on four formalin-fixed adult cadavers at the Anatomy Laboratory of "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest. The rectum and mesorectum were mobilized according to the TME standard. Dissections were performed under direct vision, preserving the pelvic autonomic nerves. Macroscopic findings were photographed and analyzed to determine the composition and limits of the lateral and posterior rectal wings.
resultsThe lateral rectal wings were identified as subperitoneal condensations of pelvic connective tissue connecting the mesorectal fascia with the presacral fascia. They enclosed branches of the inferior hypogastric plexus and, occasionally, the middle rectal vessels (absent in all four cases). The posterior rectal wings appeared as sagittal condensations surrounding branches of the middle sacral vessels. Both types of wings merged with the mesorectal fascia at sites where neurovascular elements traversed toward the rectal wall, representing extensions of the sacro-recto-genito-pubic laminae.
conclusionsBoth lateral and posterior rectal wings represent regional specializations of the pelvic subperitoneal connective tissue. Their recognition harmonizes anatomical terminology with surgical reality, refining the understanding of pelvic fascial planes critical for nerve-sparing TME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.