Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186577›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A Qualitative Study of the Systems-Based Practice Competency in United States Graduate Medical Education.

Ami L DeWaters, Erin Miller, Nate Long, Paul Haidet, Jed Gonzalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ami L DeWatersInternal Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Erin MillerBiostatistics, RTI Health Solutions, Hershey, USA.
Nate LongMedicine, MaineHealth, Portland, USA.
Paul HaidetMedicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Jed GonzaloInternal Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Systems-based practice (SBP) is a core competency in U.S. graduate medical education (GME), but it is not well implemented; we examined current factors that need to be addressed to advance SBP. Methods  Between March and July 2021, 24 physicians, nurses, educators, and leaders in the field of SBP were interviewed using a semi-structured guide. Individuals were selected based on their influence on the origin or development of SBP. The authors iteratively collected and analyzed data using real-time analytic memos, regular adjudication sessions, and thematic analysis. Themes were agreed upon by the research team. Results  Four themes were identified: (1) co-production is a central concept in the implementation of SBP, (2) co-production needs to occur between multiple stakeholders across a multitude of settings, (3) health organizations need to transform into learning health organizations to advance SBP, and (4) macrosystem-level fragmentation and organizational culture are inhibiting SBP in healthcare delivery. Conclusions The ability of GME programs to successfully implement SBP is closely tied to their ability to collaborate with their local health systems and have those health systems actively support SBP principles. Co-production and transformation into learning health systems are two key strategies for achieving optimized SBP.

Indexed as

co-productioncore competencygraduate medical education (gme)learning health systemsqualitative studies

Identifiers

PMID42186577
PMCPMC13198773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.