ArticleCureus2026
Bilateral Bloody Nipple Discharge in a Primigravid Patient: A Benign Presentation Mimicking Pathology.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bloody nipple discharge during pregnancy is a rare clinical finding that often causes significant anxiety for both the patient and the clinician. Bloody nipple discharge usually raises suspicion of malignancy or intraductal papilloma. However, it can occur as a benign, self-limiting physiological process during pregnancy due to increased breast vascularity and epithelial proliferation (rusty pipe syndrome). We report a case of a 31-year-old primigravid woman at 16 weeks' gestation presenting with bilateral, spontaneous, multi-duct bloody nipple discharge without associated palpable masses or breast pain. Breast ultrasound revealed no pathological findings, demonstrating normal pregnancy-related parenchymal changes without focal lesions, and cytology confirmed benign findings. Cytology played a supportive, not diagnostic, role because of its relatively low sensitivity. The patient was managed conservatively with close clinical surveillance. Symptoms remained stable throughout the gestational period and resolved spontaneously 10 days postpartum. This case highlights the importance of recognizing benign causes of bloody nipple discharge in pregnancy and supports a non-invasive, stepwise diagnostic approach (triple assessment) to avoid unnecessary invasive interventions in the pregnant patient while ensuring patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.