Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186517›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2026

Concurrent intraductal papilloma and nipple adenoma: a case report and review of the literature.

Angelo Federico, Sara Glendinning, Helen Mabry

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angelo FedericoGeneral Surgery, Corewell Health, Dearborn, MI 48124, United States.
Sara GlendinningGeneral Surgery, Corewell Health, Dearborn, MI 48124, United States.
Helen MabryBreast Surgical Oncology, Mercy Health, Perrysburg, OH 43551, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nipple adenoma is a rare benign proliferative lesion that makes up <1% of diagnosed benign breast lesions. The diagnosis of an intraductal papilloma is more common and represents an estimated 2%-3% of all benign breast tumours. The concomitant diagnoses of these pathologies together is extremely rare. Here, we report the case of a 34-year-old female that presented with a left-sided nipple lesion discovered on self-exam. Subsequent imaging was classified as BIRADS 4A and the patient opted to undergo surgical excision. Resultant pathology revealed both nipple duct adenoma and intraductal papilloma with florid ductal hyperplasia and focal atypia. Given the rarity of underlying nipple pathologies and the associated diagnostic difficulties, a thorough and complete workup is crucial even when benign breast pathology is suspected.

Indexed as

histopathologyintraductal papillomamalignancynipple adenoma

Identifiers

PMID42186517
PMCPMC13198716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.