ArticleOpen research Europe2025
Developing Researchers' Competencies through CARE-KNOW-DO and upSKILL.map, aligned with EU and UNESCO Priorities.
Article in Open research Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In an era of interlinked global challenges, researchers are expected to combine disciplinary excellence with socially relevant solutions. Existing competency frameworks recognise transversal skills but tend to prioritise employability and career management, treating skills as value-neutral and positioning sustainability, equity, and justice at the margins. This creates skills mismatches and leaves many researchers underprepared for work aligned with the UN-SDGs and Horizon Europe priorities. Methods: This Phase-1 study within the European METEOR project develops upSKILL.map and provides in-context pilot validation for eco-outwards research careers. Grounded in the CARE-KNOW-DO principles, the tool articulates eight competency domains (8Cs) integrating values, knowledge, and action. A phase-appropriate cohort of 40 researchers completed the 8Cs self-assessment and wrote reflective think pieces, generating a mixed-methods dataset for contextual psychometric analysis and thematic enquiry. Results: Exploratory factor analysis, reliability testing, expert review, and user feedback converge on a five-factor descriptive clustering explaining 75.7% of variance as a baseline, clustering the 8Cs into: Responsible policy-engaged research; Collaborative inclusive leadership; Interdisciplinary networked innovation; Societal impact methodologies; and Resilient capacity development. Datasets highlight an aspiration-practice gap between collaborative, transformative goals and uneven institutional support. Conclusion: Conceptually, the study advances a shift from "competency-as-performance" to "competency-as-worldview", articulating the eco-researcher identity where technical expertise is inseparable from commitments to sustainability, equity, and justice. This represents one valued orientation among legitimate research identities; fundamental science and curiosity-driven inquiry remain equally valid. Methodologically, it provides context-bound evidence that upSKILL.map can function as a low-cost diagnostic tool combining psychometric analysis with qualitative insight. Organisationally, it outlines how doctoral schools and researcher development leads can use the five-factor clustering to identify gaps and design targeted interventions for local and global agendas. Exploratory findings are based on a single institution and a small, self-selected cohort, so further multi-institutional confirmation is needed before high-stakes or sector-wide use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.