Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186484›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Birth Mode Preferences and Associated Factors Among Jordanian Pregnant Women.

Salwa A AbuAlRub, Falastine Hamdan, Muhammed Abu Baker, Eshraq Al Momani, Mohammad Etoom, Leen Hilwah

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07657663 (Effect of Pecha Kucha-Based Normal Birth Education on Birth Beliefs and Mode of Birth Preferences Among Pregnant Women Considering Elective Cesarean Section), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07657663 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Pecha Kucha-Based Normal Birth Education on Birth Beliefs and Mode of Birth Preferences Among Pregnant Women Considering Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBurdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled76ConditionsChildbirth Education, Birth Beliefs, Elective Cesarean SectionArmsPecha Kucha-Based Normal Birth Education, Traditional Normal Birth Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Salwa A AbuAlRubDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Irbid University College, Al-Balqa Applied University, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7009-5699
Falastine HamdanFaculty of Nursing College, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al Salt, Jordan.
Muhammed Abu BakerObstetrics and Gynaecology Specialist, Princess Raya Hospital, Ministry of Health, Irbid, Jordan.
Eshraq Al MomaniIndependent Researcher, London, Canada.
Mohammad EtoomDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Irbid University College, Al-Balqa Applied University, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9047-1522
Leen HilwahIndependent Researcher, London, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The right to choose a mode of delivery is an essential aspect of compassionate and respectful care that promotes both maternal and neonatal health, as ignoring the mother's preferences heightens the risk of postpartum depression and post-traumatic stress. This study utilized the Health Belief Model as a theoretical foundation for understanding pregnant women's beliefs regarding their preferred mode of birth and its associated factors. Objective: This study aimed to assess birth mode preferences and associated factors among Jordanian pregnant women. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted in northern Jordan from March to May 2025. The respondents were recruited by convenience sampling. The data was collected through online-administered questionnaire utilizing a valid and reliable instrument, which was based on the five core domains of the Health Belief Model. The data analysis was preformed through SPSS software (Version 28). Results: The total number of participating pregnant women in this study was 330. 23.4% of the respondents preferred cesarean section and 76.4% preferred vaginal delivery. Women who preferred cesarean section had higher mean scores for perceived benefits, lower mean scores for perceived susceptibility and severity of cesarean section compared to those who preferred vaginal delivery. Predictors of CS preference included age (OR = 3.203, Conclusion: Women often prefer the mode of birth which they perceive to have benefits that outweigh potential risks and complications. Therefore, maternity health care institutions should develop antenatal education programs based on the Health Belief Model about the benefits, risks and complications of both modes of birth.

Indexed as

birthcesarean sectionJordanobstetricpreferencepregnant womenvaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID42186484
PMCPMC13198651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.