ArticlePeerJ2026
Inhibition of return mediates the relationship between openness to experience and visuospatial ability.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Openness to experience-a core dimension of the Big Five personality framework-has been increasingly linked to cognitive functioning, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Visuospatial ability (VA), a key cognitive domain involved in perception, memory, and problem-solving, has shown associations with Openness in prior research. Inhibition of return (IOR), a bottom-up attentional mechanism that slows responses to recently examined locations to promote orienting toward new ones, may serve as a cognitive intermediary by optimizing how visual attention is dynamically allocated. Objective: This study investigated whether IOR mediates the relationship between Openness and VA, offering new insights into personality-related differences in attentional processing. Methods: A total of 290 healthy adults completed standardized assessments of personality traits (NEO-FFI), cognitive function (RBANS), and a MATLAB-based exogenous cueing paradigm to quantify IOR. △ LRT_s, a transformed metric representing IOR strength, was calculated as the response time difference between valid and invalid trials. Group comparisons, correlation analyses, and mediation models were conducted using SPSS and the PROCESS macro, controlling for age, gender, and education. Results: Participants with high Openness scores demonstrated significantly higher VA and stronger IOR effects ( Conclusions: This study provides novel evidence that IOR serves as a mediating attentional mechanism linking Openness to enhanced visuospatial performance. These findings highlight the dynamic interaction between personality traits and low-level cognitive processes, suggesting that IOR may represent a neurocognitive pathway through which Openness facilitates efficient attentional allocation. The results have implications for understanding individual differences in cognitive functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.