ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Identification and validation of a seven-gene metastasis-associated prognostic model in breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary Tumor Epigenetic and Transcriptomic Alterations Associated with Nodal Burden and Metastatic Risk in ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Metastasis is the primary cause of mortality in patients with breast cancer. This study aimed to develop a prognostic signature based on metastasis- and cancer-associated differentially expressed genes (M-CA-DEGs) and to identify potential novel therapeutic genes. Materials and methods: Data were acquired from the TCGA-BRCA, AURORA US Network, SCAN-B, and GEO databases. M-CA-DEGs were identified, and a prognostic risk model was constructed via univariate Cox and LASSO regression analyses. The prognostic value was verified using calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Independent prognostic factors were subsequently validated. Functional enrichment was assessed through GSEA and ssGSEA. Immune infiltration and mutation profiles were compared between risk groups. A TF-mRNA regulatory network was constructed. Single-cell analysis was performed to characterize gene expression patterns. The mRNA levels of prognostic genes were examined in MCF-10A mammary epithelial cells and breast cancer cell lines. Results: We developed and validated a novel seven-gene, metastasis-associated prognostic signature ( Conclusion: This study establishes a robust, biologically grounded, metastasis-related seven-gene prognostic model for breast cancer. Beyond prediction, our work identifies two novel therapeutic targets and reveals distinct immune and metabolic phenotypes across risk groups, thereby providing novel mechanistic insights into tumor heterogeneity and actionable targets for future therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.