Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186362›Full record

ArticleNew solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS2026

Rationale for Accreditation Criteria for the MATES in Construction Workplace Suicide Prevention Program.

Anthony D LaMontagne, Tania King, Jorgen Gullestrup, Tu Boldeman, Nicholas Thompson, Brad Parker, Karyn Dale, Liam Cubbage, Trent Bazley, John Chapman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anthony D LaMontagneInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5811-5906
Tania KingSocial Equity Research Centre, School of Global Urban Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jorgen GullestrupMATES in Construction, Brisbane, Australia.
Tu BoldemanMATES in Construction, Brisbane, Australia.
Nicholas ThompsonMATES in Construction, Brisbane, Australia.
Brad ParkerMATES in Construction, Sydney, Australia.
Karyn DaleMATES in Construction, Adelaide, Australia.
Liam CubbageMATES in Construction, Perth, Australia.
Trent BazleyMATES in Construction, Brisbane, Australia.
John ChapmanMATES in Construction, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MATES in Construction originated in Australia as a workplace suicide prevention program for predominantly male, blue-collar industries with high suicide rates. Accreditation criteria were developed for the purpose of providing recognition for participating sites and promoting the program. Arising from an internal review of the MATES accreditation criteria, this article presents the purpose and history of MATE's accreditation criteria; the rationale and evidence underpinning the accreditation criteria; and the evolving practice of accreditation in the MATES context.Four accreditation criteria are specified, addressing the 3 levels of the prevention and early treatment spectrum for mental health and illness interventions (universal/selective/indicated): (1) All the available workforce on a work site must be offered General Awareness Training (GAT, universal); (2) Following initial GAT training, at least 80% of the workforce is GAT trained (universal); (3) All workers must have a "line of sight" to a worker/volunteer trained in how to connect people to help (selective); (4) the work site must be able to access an Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Trained person during operational hours (indicated).MATES programs continue to evolve, possibly warranting additional accreditation criteria in the future to acknowledge the implementation of increasingly comprehensive programs.The extent to which the MATES justification for and approach to accreditation is generalizable to other contexts is not known; however, the underlying principles and rationale provided are likely adaptable in other contexts.

Indexed as

AccreditationConstruction IndustrySuicide PreventionWorkplaceAustraliaHumansMaleaccreditationblue-collarconstructioninterventionpreventionSuicide

Identifiers

PMID42186362
PMCPMC13351104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.