Trial reportJMIR formative research2026
Testing a Smartphone-Based Intervention Targeting Anxiety Sensitivity Among Women Presenting for Emergency Care After Sexual Assault: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in pain severity, interference, and variability after sexual assault: An ecological momentary assessment study.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Anxiety sensitivity (AS), defined as the fear of anxious arousal, is a promising therapeutic target for reducing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom development after trauma exposure. Initial research suggests that smartphone-based AS interventions may be acceptable to sexual assault survivors at risk for PTSD symptoms and effective for symptom reduction, but only small one-arm proof-of-concept studies have been conducted. Objective: The goal of this study was to extend prior proof-of-concept work by conducting a pilot randomized controlled trial. The aims were to evaluate intervention efficacy, AS and PTSD symptom change, the acceptability and credibility of a control intervention, and the feasibility of a larger randomized controlled trial. Methods: A total of 60 women with high AS presenting for emergency care after sexual assault were recruited and randomized to either the AS intervention or a control condition, and they were followed up with for over 6 months via remote self-report questionnaires. Results: The findings indicated that the study population is at risk and in need of intervention: 88.8% (40/45) and 80.6% (29/36) of women sexual assault survivors in the sample met the criteria for probable PTSD at 7 weeks and 6 months post assault, respectively. Most (16/27, 59.3%) individuals receiving the AS intervention who completed it rated it as acceptable (eg, 18/21, 85.7% reported that the treatment was helpful). Early within-group reductions were not statistically significant, but by month 6, statistically significant reductions in AS and PTSD symptoms were observed in both conditions. Recruitment and retention data supported the feasibility of the study design, although some suggestions were noted for future research (eg, improving intervention and ecological momentary assessment compliance). Conclusions: This pilot study replicated the proof of concept and acceptability of a novel smartphone-based intervention targeting AS delivered to women sexual assault survivors presenting to emergency care. Intervention completion was in line with or better than traditional therapy but remained a challenge. Our selected control condition demonstrated a larger effect than expected, and we were unable to track its initiation or completion, causing difficulty in drawing conclusions. Overall, the results highlight the need for additional research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.