Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186277›Full record

ArticleNutrition reviews2026

Effect of Herbs and Spices on Acceptance, Preference, and Intake of Vegetables Among Rural Adolescents.

Kathleen L Keller, Barbara J Rolls

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathleen L KellerDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0001-6481-7018
Barbara J RollsDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University.

Funding

McCormick Science Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo test whether herbs and spices improve acceptance, preference, and intake of vegetables among rural middle and high school students.

backgroundVegetable intake among rural children and adolescents is inadequate. Novel strategies are needed to increase vegetable intake in this population.

methodsThis school-based study was conducted in 3 phases. In phase 1, recipes were developed for 8 vegetables using uniquely formulated spice blends (eg, dill, cardamom, cumin). To evaluate recipe acceptance, students (Ns = 96-110; aged 14-18 y) rated liking (100-mm visual analog scales) and preference (forced choice) for plain (oil and salt) versus seasoned vegetables. Both plain and seasoned had similar amounts of oil and salt, but the seasoned also had specially formulated herb and spice blends. In phase 2, herb and spice blends were added to 8 vegetables served in the cafeteria and their intake was compared to plain controls. In phase 3, we tested whether 5 repeated exposures to 2 of the recipes from phase 2 increased intake.

resultsIn phase 1, students generally liked and preferred the seasoned vegetables over the plain versions. However, in phase 2, vegetable selection was low (8%-15%) and overall intake was greater for plain relative to seasoned vegetables. In phase 3, repeated exposure to the dill spice blend increased students' willingness to try vegetables seasoned with this blend in the future.

conclusionsAlthough herbs and spices increased vegetable acceptance and preference among rural school children, this did not consistently translate into increased selection or intake in the cafeteria setting. Increasing exposure to herbs and spices prior to implementation and involving students in intervention planning may help overcome barriers to seasoned vegetable intake in this population.

Indexed as

DietFood PreferencesRural PopulationSpicesVegetablesAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleStudentsbehaviordietpediatricsvegetables

Identifiers

PMID42186277
PMCPMC13201869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.