Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Impact of Time of Injection on the Efficacy and Safety of iGlarLixi Versus IDegAsp in Chinese People With Type 2 Diabetes: Exploratory Analysis of the Soli-D Study.
Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Time of Injection on the Efficacy and Safety of iGlarLixi Versus IDegAsp in Chinese People With Type 2 Diabetes: Exploratory Analysis of the Soli-D Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo compare the efficacy and safety of the fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) with premixed insulin degludec plus insulin aspart (IDegAsp) according to the injection time of IDegAsp. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe 24-week, multicentre, randomised, open-label Soli-D study enrolled Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) suboptimally controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). This exploratory analysis evaluated glycaemic efficacy, body weight, basal insulin daily dose and hypoglycaemia outcomes with once-daily iGlarLixi (injected before breakfast) versus IDegAsp (injected before breakfast, lunch or dinner).
resultsOf 582 participants, 291 received iGlarLixi, with injections self-administered before breakfast, and 291 received IDegAsp, with injections self-administered before breakfast (n = 139), lunch (n = 54) or dinner (n = 98). Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions from baseline to Week 24 were greater with iGlarLixi than IDegAsp injected before lunch (least squares mean difference -0.24% [-2.3 mmol/mol]) or dinner (-0.29% [-3.2 mmol/mol]), and slightly greater than IDegAsp injected before breakfast (-0.12% [-1.3 mmol/mol]). Average 2-h postprandial glucose (2-h PPG) reductions were also greater with iGlarLixi than IDegAsp, regardless of injection time. iGlarLixi provided additional benefits, including reduced body weight, lower total insulin doses and less hypoglycaemia risk compared with IDegAsp in all injection-time subgroups.
conclusionsOnce-daily iGlarLixi, injected before breakfast, was associated with improved HbA1c control and greater average 2-h PPG reductions compared with IDegAsp, regardless of injection time, in Chinese adults with T2D suboptimally controlled with OADs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.