Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186152›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Cost-Effectiveness of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening at Age 40 Among Average-Risk Individuals in China.

Yuxuan Li, Yunbo Zhang, Wendi Zhang, Rui Li, Ruyi Xia, Xianbin Hou, Mingwang Shen, Zhuoru Zou, Guihua Zhuang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuxuan LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3773-6703
Yunbo ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Wendi ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Rui LiHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ruyi XiaSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xianbin HouDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Mingwang ShenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Zhuoru ZouDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Guihua ZhuangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8377-6071

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M732773China Postdoctoral Science Foundation BX20220254National Natural Science Foundation of China 82304206National Science and Technology Major Project 2023ZD0501400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

China recently updated its colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines, lowering the recommended initiation age from 45 to 40 years for the general population in response to the rising burden and earlier onset. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of earlier initiation and identifies the optimal screening strategy. A Markov model was developed to compare 48 screening strategies, combining different starting ages, methods (fecal immunochemical test [FIT], multitarget stool DNA [MT-sDNA] test, methylated Septin 9 [mSEPT9] test, computed tomography colonography [CTC], or colonoscopy), and frequencies, from the healthcare system perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated based on quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with willingness-to-pay thresholds set at one- and three-time China's per-capita gross domestic product (GDP). The results show that all screening strategies are cost-effective compared with non-screening under the three-time GDP threshold, with nearly half found to be cost-saving. Starting annual FIT screening at age 40 is the most cost-effective under both thresholds, with an ICER of US$5381/QALY and reductions of 5.5% in CRC cases and 7.4% in CRC-related deaths compared with the second-best strategy of starting at age 45. Starting 10-yearly colonoscopy screening at age 40 may be optimal, but only under very low thresholds. Both MT-sDNA and mSEPT9 tests would become the optimal options only if their costs were substantially reduced. The findings are highly robust across sensitivity analyses. This study supports the updated recommendation to lower the CRC screening initiation age for average-risk individuals and identifies annual FIT screening as the optimal strategy in the current context of China.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningAdultChinaColonography, Computed TomographicColonoscopyCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSeptinsSEPTIN9 protein, humanSeptinscolorectal cancercost‐effectivenessMarkov modelscreening

Identifiers

PMID42186152
PMCPMC13495905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.