ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026
Evaluation of illicit drug contaminants in seized cannabis in Arizona and California, 2023-2024.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite public health concerns, fentanyl, cocaine, and other illicit drug contaminants remain largely understudied in unregulated cannabis. Here, we developed an analytical method to quantify a panel of common illicit drugs in cannabis and tested the law enforcement seizures in Arizona and California in evaluation of the illicit drug contamination in black- and gray-market cannabis. One hundred and eighteen cannabis dried flower samples were collected by the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and the US Postal Inspection Service between 2023 and 2024. The prepared samples were analyzed using an Agilent 6495 LC-MS-MS for 16 illicit drugs. Twenty-five (21.2%) of the cannabis flower samples had detectable concentrations of illicit drugs. Only three of the 16 analytes tested were detected, including cocaine (20.3%), methamphetamine (MAMP; 3.4%), and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA/Ecstasy; 0.9%). The highest concentration of illicit drugs was cocaine at 12,000 ppm (or 1.2% by weight). This pilot study demonstrates the presence of illicit drugs in black- and gray-market cannabis largely due to the contamination in the unkempt environment where they are being assembled and distributed. Intentional spiking appears to be rare, but the level of spiked cocaine can pose a health risk to consumers of unregulated products. Further studies are needed to survey the chemical contaminants of black- and gray-market cannabis and better understand their public health risk nationwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.