ArticleBMC psychology2026
Validation of the Korean version of the death anxiety beliefs and behaviours scale.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Death anxiety is a complex psychological construct that includes affective, cognitive, and behavioural reactions to the awareness of mortality. The Death Anxiety Beliefs and Behaviours Scale (DABBS) is designed to capture multiple dimensions of death anxiety. This study aimed to adapt the DABBS into Korean and evaluate its psychometric properties in Korean adults. A sample of Korean adults (N = 752) participated, and the data were analyzed to examine reliability, factor structure, and measurement invariance across gender and age groups. The theoretically proposed three-factor structure (affect, beliefs, and behaviours) was supported by factor analyses, providing strong evidence for the reliability and construct validity of the scale. Measurement invariance was supported across gender; however, configural invariance was not supported across age groups, indicating that the scale may not allow for direct comparisons of death anxiety across age groups. This finding may reflect developmental differences in how death anxiety is structured across the lifespan. Overall, the Korean version of the DABBS appears to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing multidimensional death anxiety in Korean adults, with potential applications in both research and clinical settings, although caution is warranted when comparing scores across age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.