Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186085›Full record

SynthesisBMC nutrition2026

Impact of nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions on dietary diversity and selected nutritional outcomes among vulnerable populations in Ethiopia: a systematic review.

Kassahun Ayele, Meron Demisew, Daniel Asfaw Kitessa, Habtamu Fekadu Gemede

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kassahun AyeleDepartment of Food and Nutritional sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia. kassahunayele23@gmail.com.
Meron DemisewDepartment of Food and Nutritional sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Daniel Asfaw KitessaDepartment of Food and Nutritional sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Habtamu Fekadu GemedeDepartment of Food Science and Applied Nutrition, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalnutrition continues to be a significant public health issue in Ethiopia, disproportionately affecting children under five years of age, pregnant and lactating women, and low-income households. Nutrition-sensitive agricultural (NSA) interventions are agricultural strategies specifically designed to enhance nutrition by improving food availability, access, and dietary quality in a population. These interventions have been increasingly advocated to address the root causes of malnutrition. However, their effectiveness in enhancing dietary diversity and nutritional outcomes in Ethiopia has not yet been systematically assessed. This review aimed to evaluate the effects of NSA interventions on dietary diversity and nutritional status among vulnerable populations in Ethiopia.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify studies published between January 2015 and March 2025. Eligible studies included experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational (primarily cross-sectional) designs that evaluated NSA interventions and reported dietary and nutritional outcomes. Study selection, data extraction, and reporting were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.

resultsIn this review, ten studies were analyzed. Most of these studies indicated improvements in dietary diversity among women and children following NSA interventions, with statistically significant increases in dietary diversity scores or the proportion of households that achieved minimum dietary diversity. However, evidence regarding anthropometric outcomes in children remains inconsistent across studies. Integrated interventions that combine agriculture, nutrition education, and behavior change communication generally demonstrate stronger positive effects than single-component interventions. The magnitude of the impact varied based on the duration, intensity, and context of the intervention. Common challenges in implementation include limited infrastructure, weak market linkages, and resource constraints.

conclusionAlthough NSA interventions consistently enhance dietary diversity among vulnerable populations in Ethiopia, their impact on anthropometric nutritional outcomes remains uncertain. Although integrated, multi-sectoral approaches seem more promising, the overall strength of the evidence is limited by the heterogeneity of the studies included. Future interventions should focus on context-specific, long-term strategies and bolster the implementation systems to improve nutritional outcomes.

Indexed as

Dietary diversityEthiopiaMalnutritionNutrition-sensitive agricultureVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID42186085
PMCPMC13410855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.