ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Predicting stride time variability from waist-mounted IMU data using machine learning: toward non-invasive gait stability monitoring in endurance running.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStride time variability (STV) is an important indicator of gait stability and motor control during running, yet its assessment typically depends on laboratory-based systems or distal sensor placement. This study evaluated whether a single waist-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) can estimate STV during prolonged treadmill running using machine learning.
methodEighteen healthy young adults completed 30 min of treadmill running at self-selected speeds while IMUs were placed on the right dorsal foot and low back. Stride times were identified from the foot-mounted IMU and used to calculate STV as the coefficient of variation of 50 consecutive strides, which served as the reference outcome. From the waist-mounted IMU, time- and frequency-domain features were extracted from tri-axial acceleration and angular velocity signals. Four regression models, including artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and XGBoost, were developed to estimate STV. Model performance was evaluated using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation with root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R²).
resultsAll models demonstrated good subject-independent predictive ability, with XGBoost achieving the best overall performance (R² =0.942, MAE = 0.005, RMSE = 0.009). Features related to forward acceleration, particularly mean and dominant frequency in the X direction, were consistently among the most influential predictors.
conclusionThese findings suggest that trunk kinematics recorded from a single waist-mounted IMU contain sufficient information to estimate running STV, supporting the feasibility of unobtrusive gait stability monitoring during endurance running with implications for assessing fall risk and rehabilitation progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.