Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42186055›Full record

SynthesisHuman genomics2026

The genetic insights of sporadic male infertility: a systematic review of WES and WGS studies (2014-2024).

Hoda Zahi, Fatima Sfifou, Meriem Slaoui, Lamyae Chentoufi, Redouane Abouqal, Houyam Hardizi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hoda ZahiLaboratory of Histology, Embryology, and Cytogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rabat, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco. hoda_zahi@um5.ac.ma.
Fatima SfifouLaboratory of Histology, Embryology, and Cytogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rabat, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.
Meriem SlaouiLaboratory of Histology, Embryology, and Cytogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rabat, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.
Lamyae ChentoufiLaboratory of Histology, Embryology, and Cytogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rabat, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.
Redouane AbouqalLaboratory of Biostatistics, Clinical and Epidemiological Research, Department of Public Health, Medical School and Pharmacy, University Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Houyam HardiziLaboratory of Histology, Embryology, and Cytogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rabat, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male infertility is a complex and heterogeneous disorder. It has a significant genetic component, although some cases remain idiopathic. Next-generation sequencing, particularly whole-exome (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has become a powerful tool for uncovering new genetic causes. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize genes linked to male infertility reported in WES or WGS studies. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024597301). A bibliographic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2014-2024). We included human studies that used WES or WGS to investigate the genetics of male infertility. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment with JBI checklists. Out of 8018 identified records, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 169 unique genes were reported; after removing duplicates, 143 genes remained. The most frequently implicated phenotypes were multiple morphological abnormalities of the flagella (MMAF) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Genes were stratified by recurrence across independent cohorts and by functional validation status. Of the 143 genes, five were replicated with functional validation, 22 demonstrated either replication or functional validation, and 116 were reported in single studies with only in silico support. In studies applying the criteria of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), the diagnostic yield was 48% for MMAF and 12-23% for NOA, with an average variant-of-uncertain-significance (VUS) burden of 47%. ACMG classification was inconsistently applied across studies. MMAF-associated genes were predominantly autosomal recessive (95%), whereas NOA-associated genes exhibited greater diversity: 60% autosomal recessive, 25% X-linked, and 15% autosomal dominant. Only 34% of genes had undergone functional validation. In summary, among WES and WGS studies of predominantly sporadic cohorts, most identified genes were reported in single studies without functional validation, and standardized variant classification was implemented in only a minority of studies.

Indexed as

AzoospermiaGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseInfertility, MaleWhole Genome SequencingExome SequencingHumansMaleGenesGenetic variantsMale infertilitySystematic reviewWhole-exome sequencingWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID42186055
PMCPMC13386772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.