ArticleBMC medical education2026
Assessment of faculty members' perceptions towards community-oriented health professions education in Egypt: a concurrent convergent mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the growing recognition of Community-Oriented Health Professions Education (COHPE) as an essential framework for developing socially accountable healthcare practitioners, there remains a critical knowledge gap regarding faculty members' perceptions of COHPE across different health professions disciplines and institutional contexts.
aimThis study investigates faculty perceptions of COHPE implementation across multiple disciplines and institutions in Egypt.
methodsA concurrent mixed-methods design was used, involving 454 faculty members from governmental and non-governmental health professions institutions. Quantitative data were collected via validated surveys and analysed using descriptive statistics and agreement indices. Qualitative data from focus group discussions underwent thematic analysis. Integration of both datasets followed a convergent design to identify patterns and contradictions in implementation experiences.
resultsOverall, COHPE implementation was rated as neutral (mean agreement index: 2.8/5), suggesting uncertainty rather than an endorsement issue. Four domains reflected moderate implementation: relevance to community needs, priority health problems, cultural sensitivity, and health systems integration. Domains such as community empowerment, involvement, and partnership development received the lowest scores. Ten overarching themes were identified, with logistical constraints, curriculum rigidity, and faculty development gaps being the most recurrent. Faculty experience did not correlate with stronger COHPE implementation, revealing a paradox in traditional education models.
conclusionFindings highlight a widespread conceptual awareness of COHPE principles, but persistent structural and cultural barriers limit their full integration. The convergence of quantitative neutrality and qualitative concern indicates systemic rather than isolated challenges. Strategic reforms targeting curriculum design, faculty training, and stakeholder engagement are essential to transition COHPE from idealistic talk to embedded practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.