ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for functional constipation in school-aged children.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify independent risk factors for functional constipation (FC) in school-aged children, and to develop and internally validate a nomogram-based risk prediction model for early screening of high-risk populations.
methodsIn this single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional case-control study, we enrolled 467 school-aged children who presented to the Constipation Clinic or Department of Child Health Care at Wuhan Children's Hospital between January 2024 and May 2025. Participants were randomly allocated into a derivation cohort (n = 326) and an internal validation cohort (n = 141) in a 7:3 ratio. Children in the derivation cohort were classified as FC or healthy controls based on Rome IV criteria. Independent risk factors were identified through multivariable logistic regression. A nomogram prediction model was then developed using the R software based on the results of the multivariable analysis. Model discrimination was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), and calibration was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. For internal validation, the predictive performance of the established nomogram was assessed on an independent validation cohort, which comprised 141 school-aged children (68 with FC and 73 healthy controls). This assessment was based on a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, with performance quantified by the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsMultivariable analysis identified the following independent risk factors for FC in school-aged children: shorter duration of exclusive breastfeeding, absence of any toilet training, child's concern over lack of privacy during defecation, complete unwillingness to defecate at school, frequent complaints of school-related stress, and suboptimal daily parent-child interaction time (all P < 0.05). The nomogram demonstrated excellent discrimination in the derivation cohort (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.85-0.92; sensitivity 74%, specificity 86%) with good calibration. Performance remained robust in the validation cohort (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.90; sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%).
conclusionsIncorporating key modifiable factors from type of infant feeding, toilet training, school environment, psychological adaptation, and parent-child interaction, the developed nomogram provides a simple, intuitive, and feasible clinical tool. It demonstrates good discriminative ability and predictive accuracy, offering a practical and actionable guide for the early identification of school-aged children at high risk of FC and for informing targeted preventive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.