ArticleBMC psychology2026
Relationship between decision regret, anxiety, and depression in surrogate decision-makers for neurocritical patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: a cross-lagged analysis.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDecision regret is common among surrogate decision-makers for neurocritical patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC). This regret, which stems from uncertain patient preferences and complex critical care decisions, predisposes surrogates to adverse psychological outcomes, including anxiety and depression. However, as most evidence on this association comes from cross-sectional studies, the directional relationships and underlying mechanisms between decision regret and psychological distress remain unclear. This prospective longitudinal study employed a cross-lagged panel analysis to delineate the longitudinal trajectory of these symptoms and to explore their bidirectional relationships.
methodsWe conducted a prospective longitudinal study from January to November 2024, recruiting 227 surrogate decision-makers for neurocritical patients with pDoC from two tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China. We assessed decision regret, anxiety, and depression using the Decision Regret Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at one (T1), three (T2), and six (T3) months after the patient's diagnosis. Cross-lagged panel models examined the bidirectional relationships between heightened decision regret and symptoms of anxiety and depression.
resultsThe average level of decision regret among surrogate decision-makers initially peaked and subsequently declined over time. In contrast, symptoms of anxiety and depression demonstrated a gradual decrease. The incidence rates of heightened decision regret at T1, T2, and T3 were 23.18% (n = 54), 34.33% (n = 80), and 18.03% (n = 42), respectively. Cross-lagged analyses revealed a bidirectional relationship between heightened decision regret and anxiety from T1 to T2 (β = 0.327, p < 0.05; β = 0.113, p < 0.001). From T2 to T3, however, only anxiety predicted subsequent heightened decision regret (β = 0.052, p < 0.05). A bidirectional relationship was also observed between heightened decision regret and depression from T1 to T2 (β = 0.321, p < 0.05; β = 0.094, p < 0.05).
conclusionsThis study found a reciprocal relationship and time‑dynamic relationship between heightened decision regret and symptoms of anxiety and depression of in surrogate decision-makers for neurocritical patients with pDoC. Specifically, from T1 to T2, heightened decision regret had bidirectional relationships with anxiety and with depression, respectively; from T2 to T3, only anxiety predicted subsequent heightened decision regret. Therefore, clinical staff should dynamically assess the psychological status of surrogate decision-makers in a stage-specific manner and implement differentiated intervention strategies accordingly. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.