ArticleBMC medical education2026
Usage patterns, perceived barriers and perceived impact of mobile medical applications in medical education and clinical practice: a cross-sectional study among medical students and junior doctors in Sudan.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMobile medical apps have greatly enhanced access to healthcare information and clinical decision-making globally. However, their use in Sudan faces numerous barriers, despite the growing adoption worldwide. There is limited information on how Sudanese medical students and healthcare providers utilize these apps, the challenges they face, and how these tools affect clinical decisions. This study aimed to examine usage patterns, perceived barriers, and perceived impact of mobile medical applications on clinical decision-making and learning among medical students and junior doctors in Sudan to inform future digital curriculum integration.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students in the clinical phase (4th, 5th, and 6th years), house officers, and general practitioners practicing in Sudan. Data were collected using a self-administered online questionnaire.
resultsA total of 2,945 participants completed the survey, including medical students (66.3%) and house officers or general practitioners (33.7%). Overall, 94% owned a smartphone or tablet capable of running medical applications. 80% reported using mobile medical apps during clinical training or practice, with significantly higher use among house officers and GPs than among medical students (89.0% vs. 75.0%; p < 0.001). Usage patterns differed by academic level, with junior doctors more often using clinically oriented apps for guideline reviews, drug information verification, treatment decisions, and on-call or emergencies. In contrast, students mainly used apps for academic reviews and exam preparation. The most common barrier was the cost of a paid subscription (48.0%). Participants generally viewed mobile medical applications positively, considering them accurate, time-saving, confidence-boosting, and helpful for inpatient care.
conclusionThe widespread use of medical apps, particularly among junior doctors, suggests a high readiness for digital integration; however, addressing subscription costs and providing institutional training is essential to bridge the gap between academic study and clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.