ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Impact of corneal guttata severity on visual quality in early-stage Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo quantitatively evaluate the relationship between corneal guttata and visual quality in early-stage Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) without corneal edema.
methodsTwenty eyes from twenty patients with FECD were enrolled at Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital. Guttata were classified into three grades, and objective visual quality parameters, including objective scatter index (OSI), modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF cutoff), Strehl ratio, and predicted visual acuity at 100%, 20%, and 9% contrast levels (OV100%, OV20%, OV9%), were measured using Optical Quality Analysis System II (OQAS-II). Corneal densitometry, as an indicator of backward light scatter, was assessed using a corneal Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR), including anterior and posterior corneal layers. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded in logMAR. Differences among guttata grades were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction. Correlations between guttata and visual quality were analyzed using Spearman's correlation.
resultsGuttata severity correlated positively with OSI(0.822, P<0.001) and negatively with MTF cutoff, Strehl ratio, OV100%, and OV20%(-0.750, -0.554, 0.744, 0.567, separately, P < 0.05), while correlation with OV9% was weak(0.479, P = 0.033). No significant correlations were observed between guttata severity and either anterior or posterior corneal densitometry. BCVA showed no correlation with guttata severity or OSI but correlated moderately with MTF cutoff and Strehl ratio (-0.520, -0.551, separately, P < 0.05).
conclusionIn early-stage FECD, patients' visual quality begins to decline as the density and confluence of guttata increase despite the absence of visual acuity loss or corneal edema. Quantitative guttata assessment combined with objective visual quality inspection provides a more sensitive indicator for early functional impairment and may guide earlier clinical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.