ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2026
Integrating chemical structure and high-throughput transcriptomics for mechanistically interpretable Tox21 bioactivity prediction.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictive toxicology increasingly emphasizes methods that combine scalable chemical screening with biologically interpretable mechanistic information. Existing computational approaches, however, rely largely on chemical structure alone and often fail to capture the cellular programs underlying compound-induced cellular responses. Herein, we describe a multimodal modeling framework that integrates chemical fingerprints with high-throughput transcriptomic (HTTr) dose-response profiles to predict activity for 41 curated Tox21 assay endpoints. HTTr data were obtained from TempO-Seq screens in MCF-7, U-2 OS, and HepaRG cells following exposure to ToxCast compounds across an eight-point concentration series ranging from 0.03 to 100 µM. Using gradient-boosted decision trees and nested compound-aware cross-validation, 13 assays achieved robust performance (mean area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) > 0.75), spanning nuclear receptor signaling, stress-response pathways, and xenobiotic metabolism. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based feature attribution analysis showed that predictions depend on both structural motifs and transcriptional programs, in a manner consistent with established mechanistic relationships between chemical structure, nuclear receptor biology, and adaptive cellular responses. These findings illustrate how structure and high-throughput transcriptomic dose-response signature integration enables models that are accurate and mechanistically grounded, shifting computational toxicology toward transparent and biologically informed mechanistic bioactivity prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.