ReviewCancer cell international2026
Cracking the shield: oncolytic viruses versus the tumor-immune fortress.
Review in Cancer cell international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have emerged as a promising cancer therapy due to their natural selectivity to replicate in and destroy cancer cells. However, despite encouraging preclinical and early clinical outcomes, the therapeutic efficacy of OVs in solid tumors remains limited. Recently, OVs have been genetically modified to enhance tumor specificity, promote antitumor immune activation, and overcome barriers imposed by the tumor microenvironment (TME). Hepatocellular carcinoma presents a uniquely challenging solid tumor microenvironment for oncolytic virotherapy, characterized by dense fibrotic stroma, potent hepatic immune clearance, and immunosuppressive signaling that collectively limit viral delivery, intratumoral spread, and therapeutic efficacy. The review provides an updated overview of clinical and preclinical studies of naturally occurring and engineered OVs, with a particular focus on the biological and translational challenges that restrict their effectiveness in HCC. In addition, it highlights the strategies developed to overcome delivery barriers, immune clearance, and tumor heterogeneity, which represent key obstacles to durable therapeutic responses. Strategies such as stromal targeting, hypoxia-adapted constructs, and the use of 3D organoid models as mimic platforms to evaluate delivery and therapeutic strategies are also discussed. Finally, this review aims to integrate recent advances in viral engineering, immune modulation, and organoid models, and critically evaluates how these approaches, together with emerging clinical trial data, can inform the rational design of next-generation oncolytic viruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.