ArticleBMC urology2026
Ureteral wall thickness as an imaging-based predictor of difficult ureter during ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the value of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) obtained from non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) for predicting difficult ureter (DU) among patients receiving ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS).
methodsPatients with unilateral ureteral stones managed by URS were retrospectively reviewed. According to intraoperative findings, they were classified into DU or non-DU group. UWT was measured at the level of the stone on preoperative NCCT. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff value of UWT for predicting DU.
resultsA total of 271 patients managed with URS were enrolled in the study, with 67 (24.72%) in the DU group and 204 (75.28%) in the non-DU group. The mean UWT in the DU group was 3.77 ± 1.24 mm, which was significantly higher than that in the non-DU group. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that UWT was an independent risk factor for DU, with an OR of 2.139 (95% CI: 1.634-2.79). The ROC curve demonstrated that a UWT cutoff of 2.9 mm provided the best threshold for predicting DU, with sensitivity and specificity levels of 77.6% and 71.6%, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.786. Moreover, a UWT greater than 2.9 mm was associated with abnormal endoscopic findings during surgery, prolonged operative time, and a reduced stone-free rate.
conclusionUWT is an independent risk factor for DU. Preoperative measurement of UWT holds significant value in predicting DU. These findings may assist in surgical planning before URS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.