ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Comparison of candidemia caused by Candida auris and non-auris Candida spp.: a retrospective cohort study on clinical characteristics, risk factors, and antifungal resistance profiles.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCandida auris has emerged as a significant global health threat due to its resistance to multiple antifungal agents and its prominent role in healthcare-associated infections. This study aims to compare the clinical characteristics, risk factors, antifungal resistance profiles, and mortality rates of candidemia caused by C. auris and non-auris Candida spp. (NACS). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from 2021 to 2024. Patients aged 18 years and older with positive blood cultures for Candida spp. were included. Demographic data, comorbidities, risk factors, mortality rates, and treatment protocols were analyzed.
resultsA total of 1,088 candidemia cases were included in the study (C. auris: 126 cases, NACS: 962 cases). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the C. auris group compared to the NACS group (50.98 ± 38.79 vs. 33.05 ± 25.57 days, p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for C. auris candidemia included longer hospitalization before candidemia (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.07-3.31, p = 0.026), prior antifungal use within 30 days (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.22-3.03, p = 0.005), and ICU admission (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.10-3.92, p = 0.023). Antifungal resistance rates among C. auris isolates were 96.49% for fluconazole, 72.81% for amphotericin B, and 25.89% for caspofungin. The 30-day mortality rate was lower in the C. auris group (48.4%) compared to the NACS group (60.2%) (p = 0.012).
conclusionAlthough crude 30-day mortality was lower in the C. auris group, adjusted analysis showed comparable 30-day mortality between the C. auris and NACS groups. These findings highlight the increasing clinical burden of C. auris and support accurate species identification, local antifungal susceptibility surveillance, and rigorous infection-control measures. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.